~2200 years ago, a man named Eratosthenes made a pretty good estimation of the size of the Earth using the length of shadows during the summer solstice at two different locations.
To repeat this experiment there are some requirements:
1. I needed a measuring stick that was perpendicular to a board to measure the length of the shadow.
2. I needed two locations north and south of each other that fell along the same longitude, so that I could calculate a direct polar circumference.
3. I needed to find out when "noon" was, since daylight noon (the highest point of the sun) is not the same time as clock noon.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1. To fix some of the problems that stemmed from the last experiment I created a larger and better measuring stick.
Here is my handy assistant making calculations and measurements.
I used comments on my previous post to improve on this on. I increased the size of the vertical stick, chose a metal rod since it was not warped and not likely to become warped without noticing, and on the bottom I placed screw feet so I could adjust the levelness of the board.
High Noon time was set for 1:29 pm on both the day before and after the summer solstice.
From the previous post I am going to take 2 readings from two locations that are approximately along the same line of longitude. (C and B on the diagram below). From these I will calculate the difference in the angle and therefore can calculate the size of the Earth.
This time I went for a bit further and ended up at a distance of 66,758.87 m apart from each measurement. I had hoped this would help with the accuracy of the results.
I had double checked and my math previously was correct, where:
Circumference = Arc Length * Difference in the angles/360
For this experiment:
Arc length = 66,758.87 m
Difference in the angles = 1.4149 degress
C = 66,758.87 * 1.4149/ 360
C = 16,985.79 km
Still I am majorly off. Only by 57% this time. A 3% improvement. Good?
--------------------------------------------------------.
Next year I will perform the experiment again. This time with a larger measuring device and more distant measuring localities.
You'd need to increase your distance by more than an order of magnitude to match Eratosthenes, right? I wonder if that would result in an order of magnitude error decrease.
ReplyDeleteYou are also changing both variables (distance and stick length) with this one. While it is probably a good idea to get a bigger stick, would you consider keeping this contraption around for next solstice? It would be interesting to see whether you get the same result at a longer distance.
Interesting idea. Not sure if I have the pieces of it around anymore since I ran the experiment a while ago. I will have to look and see and maybe run the experiment with both a new device and the old one.
Delete